Friday, May 29, 2020

Discuss The Difference Between State And Government - 550 Words

Discuss The Difference Between State And Government (Coursework Sample) Content: Characteristics of a stateThere four major characteristic of a State from which is disitiquished it from a government. Since a state is an idea, a concept, as well as a noun used to represent a society of people living on a specific territory organized for the exercise of independence. These features are;Population:The population is the major character that a state if formed from. Since a state cannot exist without having people whom they call themselves a nation. Also population is the most noticeable essential feature that a state should have that constitute its people. Consequently, States in which a population shares a common social and political consensus as well as an agreement reference to fundamental beliefs, have the steadiest governments on earth.Territory:The second key feature of the state is having its own line of land since a state, a country as well as a city has its own boundary. When it happens to arise conflicts between states or countries over whe re borders supposed to be placed. Boundaries could as well be changed because of the war, purchase of territory or negotiations involving two or more governments.Sovereignty:Another feature of a state is being sovereignty. Having political sovereignty it means that the state has a total supreme power in its boundary of its region (Fung, 2016). It might shape foreign policy, make laws, and make its individual actions with no the endorsement of a higher power.Government:The government is as well a prudent element or feature of the state since it plays major functions on behalf of state. It represents the will of people through elected representative. In addition, a government is an institution by which the state continues with its social order, providing services to public, and enforcing decisions which are binding on its people.Question ONEDifferences between state and governmentThere are various differences that distinguish a state from a government. And among them are;Government i s one of element of the state:This is because a State has four fundamental elements namely; Population, Government, Territory and Sovereignty (Revich et al. 2017). Among this the Government is one of them; whereas, it is only one component of the State that acts for the state.Government is an Agent of the State:Government is agency of the State since it does things on behave of state. It is the same agency of State that formulates the will of state and makes it to be laws, the government implements laws of state and guarantee conformity to all laws of state. Government executes authority and power on behalf of state.State is Abstract while the Government is Concrete:State is an idea, a concept, as well as a noun used to represent a society of people living on a specific territory organized for the exercise of independence. While the government is formed by the persons within the State. It is created by peoples representatives and the government has a specific and defined organizatio n as well as form. The government is seen as players exercising power State.Government is organized by a section of population of State:All people in the State are citizens; however, the government is formed by representatives of citizens. Only some persons, who are elected, are representatives of citizens, form government of State.Membership of a State is compulsory but not of Government:All citizens are people State together make up population of State. Everyone gets citizenship of a state automatic right during birth and then continues to have a life. On the other hand, citizenship is not automatic since No person is forced to be part and parcel of it.Question TwoCharacteristics of a stateThere four major characteristic of a State from which is disitiquished it from a government. Since a state is an idea, a concept, as well as a noun used to represent a society of people living on a specific territory organized for the exercise of independence. These features are;Population:The p opulation is the major character that a state if formed from. Since a state cannot exist without having people whom they call themselves a nation. Also population is the most noticeable essential feature that a state should have that constitute its people. Consequently, States in which a population shares a common social and political consensus as well as ...

Tuesday, May 26, 2020

Future Essay Examples

Future Essay ExamplesThere are different wellsprings of composing the future exposition models. The conventional strategies for distributing and planning the subject may not suit the requirements of your understudy. The manner in which you consider your understudies and their short term will largy affect the subject of your future essays.Some understudies have the opportunity to concentrate yet don't have the cash to pay for study materials and they have no entrance to any sort of coaching. With this situation, you might need to urge your understudy to compose the future paper models so he/she has something to do to keep themselves involved. By furnishing them with a lot of task choices, the understudy will be compelled to explore their assignments and the task that they are going to write.They can utilize the web to assist them with discovering increasingly about the present task. On the off chance that there is an outer asset that can support them, at that point by all methods they should utilize it. On the off chance that they are in question about their subject, they can find out about it in the library. Perusing can give them a thought regarding the normal subject of the essay.If you imagine that the study hall condition would be excessively exhausting, you can likewise give a lot of choices to the understudy to look over. For instance, on the off chance that the understudy might want to expound on recent developments, at that point you can give some selection of articles and books that will assist them with making an investigation of recent developments. For this situation, you can give assets like course readings, official statements, late media reports, surveys and research papers to help them in their task. You may likewise need to utilize the blogosphere and papers as reference material in their essay.Since composing the future exposition models is only one piece of your groundwork for your understudy, you don't need to stress over the time and asset distribution when you are getting your understudy out. Sincethe assignments are to be composed whenever the timing is ideal, you don't need to stress over to what extent the understudy should place in his/her article and how much exertion you are going to place in the assignment.You can give various arrangements of future exposition models for the understudy to browse. These article models can be composed either as a rundown or as a full report of the examination that your understudy should do.Overall, there are numerous wellsprings of composing the future exposition models. You can basically remember a portion of these hotspots for your showing materials or in the assignments for your understudy with the goal that they will have the option to boost their learning and furthermore keep themselves occupied while they learn.

Monday, May 18, 2020

How to Start a College Essay That Excites You?

<h1>How to Start a College Essay That Excites You?</h1><p>A theme on which you are enthusiastic, and a subject that you appreciate composing can be found in the manner you start your school exposition. You may not know precisely how to approach making the correct sort of section into the subject. Here are a few hints on the best way to begin a school paper that energizes you and that you have a ton of fun writing.</p><p></p><p>First, you have to make a framework for your article. The thought is to abstain from composing for significant lots of time so you don't get exhausted. You should ensure that the subjects of your exposition will be intriguing to such an extent that you won't become exhausted with them.</p><p></p><p>As the center of your school article, you need to enlighten a tad regarding yourself. This can either be written in a paper or in a diary section where you can give your biography. Be mindful so as to tell about what makes you remarkable, and how this uniqueness will make you stand apart from others.</p><p></p><p>There are continually going to be distinctive school papers that have diverse beginning stages and various reasons why they are composed. Now and again, it may be that your life has changed, or that your field of intrigue has changed too. This would all be able to be raised in the primary passage of your essay.</p><p></p><p>In a couple of sections you are going to need to discuss what you have been doing since graduating. Discussion about the adjustments in your profession and where you went with your vocation. Ensure that the focal point of your paper will be around you.</p><p></p><p>The next section ought to be about your relationship with your family. Discussion about the progressions that have happened, and furthermore about the similitudes that have existed previously. Talk about what you gained from those connections and attempt to ensure that you are not saying that the past is really equivalent to the present.</p><p></p><p>Now the following passage ought to be centered around the subject of your school paper. You need to ensure that the focal point of your paper won't be about how you have changed, but instead, how you have created and developed all through your profession. Show your freshly discovered ability with your picked region of study.</p><p></p><p>Finally, you need to show how your conclusion regarding the matter of your school exposition has created after some time. You need to make a couple of strides back and understand that you are still particularly in contact with what you realized. Offer your input of what you have realized, and show how you have grown.</p>

Friday, May 8, 2020

Writing a Five Paragraph Essay

Writing a Five Paragraph EssayTo have a successful essay, you need to know how to write five-paragraph essays in the right manner. This will require you to come up with topics for your essay that are worthy of being used in the body of the work.There are several reasons why a student would be required to write a five paragraph essay. Sometimes it is necessary to be able to give the paper a strong argument that would be able to be backed up by a number of facts. It could also be the case that the student will be given a lot of homework and will need to come up with an answer to a variety of questions related to the research in order to get a better grade on the assignment.The most important thing to do when you are writing a five paragraph essay is to start by describing each topic in its own paragraph. It is very important to do this. By describing each topic at least three sentences in length, the chances of the reader having no idea about the topic or having no clue about what is g oing on will be drastically reduced.Once you have described each topic in its own paragraph, then you can then begin to provide good information about each topic. In addition to giving information about each topic, you can also take advantage of the opportunity to insert as many ideas about the topic as possible. You should be careful to only introduce ideas within the body of the paragraphs. Introducing ideas outside of the paragraphs will look unprofessional and it will also just seem like you are just using the paragraphs to fill in the blanks.A final important thing to remember is to end each paragraph on a strong note. Always end the paragraph with a sentence that you believe will make the reader want to continue reading. There are some students who feel that a sentence like 'Should you continue reading, the rest of this article is full of important information' is the best way to end a paragraph.A five-paragraph essay is also very easy to read if you know how to properly use i mages. Sometimes it is best to put pictures inside the body of the paragraphs. For example, instead of writing 'Some people like to listen to music while driving', you could put a picture of a CD player and a record player and describe how these two things go together to give an understanding of why listening to music while driving is a good idea.There are several other things that can be used to help you with writing a five paragraph essay. By knowing how to begin each paragraph, which is always best done by describing each topic, and by not assuming that a reader knows everything that is going on, you will be able to write an essay that will be far easier to read than it would otherwise be. If you are unsure about whether you know enough about any topic to give an accurate description of it, then it is okay to simply skip over it or else include a paragraph stating why it is not something that they should be worried about.Remember that if you are writing a five paragraph essay, yo u should not assume that the reader knows everything about the topic. If you fail to provide good and solid information about a topic, then you should simply move on to something else that is relevant to the essay.

Wednesday, May 6, 2020

Organizational Behavior Guide For The Flounder Fish Camp

Organizational Behavior Guide to The Flounder Fish Camp Kaylynn Bradley MGT 255- Online Jackson Fall 2014 November 11, 2014 The Flounder Fish Camp The mission of The Flounder Fish Camp is to serve the Upstate when the finest seafood around. Also, to provide fresh, healthy, nutritious, and great tasting food at reasonable prices in a clean, friendly, and convenient environment. We hope to go above and beyond to make sure our customers have the most satisfying visit from the time they walk in until the time they walk out. Ken and Pam Toney Owners Brief History The Flounder Fish Camp is located at 160 Barbado Lane, Spartanburg SC 29303. The Flounder was built in 1969 by Arthur W. and Joann Toney. It is now operated by their son and his wife Ken and Pam Toney. It is a family owned business and mostly still today family work there. The Flounder has served millions of people since 1969 and is regarded as the best seafood restaurant around. On Friday and Saturday lines can be long during prime hours but ask anyone and they will agree the line moves fast, the service is prompt and the food is always hot. Everything at The Flounder is homemade daily from the best ingredients. We have specials on each day like Cod, Tilapia, Mahi Mahi along with the typical fish favorites. We make our own hash and BBQ. OurShow MoreRelatedDeveloping Management Skills404131 Words   |  1617 Pages mymanagementlab is an online assessment and preparation solution for courses in Principles of Management, Human Resources, Strategy, and Organizational Behavior that help s you actively study and prepare material for class. Chapter-by-chapter activities, including built-in pretests and posttests, focus on what you need to learn and to review in order to succeed. Visit www.mymanagementlab.com to learn more. DEVELOPING MANAGEMENT SKILLS EIGHTH EDITION David A. Whetten BRIGHAM YOUNG UNIVERSITY Read MoreStrategic Marketing Management337596 Words   |  1351 Pages1 5.2 5.3 5.4 5.5 5.6 5.7 5.8 5.9 Learning objectives Introduction Coming to terms with buyer behaviour Factors influencing consumer behaviour The buying decision process The rise of the new consumer and the implications for marketing planning Organizational buying behaviour The growth of relationship marketing Summary Appendix: The drivers of consumer change 6 Approaches to competitor analysis 6.1 6.2 6.3 6.4 6.5 6.6 6.7 6.8 6.9 6.10 6.11 Learning objectives Introduction Against whom are we competing

Tuesday, May 5, 2020

Critique the Power of Organizations from Weberian free essay sample

Legitimate authority within a bureaucratic organization aims to remove the subjectivity and unpredictability of human action thus decisions are made and behaviours implemented in a calculable and measurable way. Persons in authority can manipulate persons’ to act in such a way by commands enshrined by power (Smith 1999). According to Weber’s theory prisons should run efficiently, officials following rules and supervised by officials in a higher office under the enforcement of legal authority. Goffman’s research on mental patients in ‘Asylums’ is at the forefront of understanding ‘total institutions’. His research gives us an insight into the world of the inmate, thus gaining an understanding of the ‘structure of the self’ and ‘mortification of the self’ in an institutional setting (1959 Goffman). Goffman identified that individuals ‘perform’ social roles, suggesting we are on stage moving from ‘back stage’ prepare and rehearsal to ‘front stage’, where we present a front and perform a role, using script, props, uniform and cues (1959 in Trevino). He suggests that we act; as if on stage, scripts emerge, props used, uniform and so on are all part of the performance (Goffman 1959, in Trevino). In 1971 Psychologist Philip Zimbardo undertook an experiment to illustrate that prisoners and guards fall into roles. Twenty four young healthy men were chosen and indiscriminately given roles as prisoner or guard. Prisoners suffered at the hands of the few sadistic guards as they imposed humiliating and degrading punishments. Some prisoners displayed emotional distress. The inhumane, unethical and undignified conditions was highlighted to Zimbardo by Christina Maslach a graduate student , the experiment was called off after 6 days as Zimbardo then realised it had gone too far (Zimbardo 2009). This paper attempts to elaborate on Weber and Goffman’s theories of power and authority within organizations paying particular attention to the Stanford Prison Experiment. An attempt will be made to critique and establish similarities and differences between their theories. Weber, Power and Authority Authority can equate to power, if it is abused the consequences to the governed can led to inhumane, mortifying and degrading situations (Weber, 1968). Weber also outlines how â€Å"impersonal authority† should be maintained within the scope of legal authority and persons’ in authority exercise control within legal bounds (Morrison 2006). Impersonal authority implies that authority is not imposed on a personal level. While these two theories can contradict themselves they are equally relevant in critiquing the Stanford Prison Experiment. This was shown by prison guard nick named ‘John Wayne’, in how he used his protected rank and authority to gain a position of social esteem using impersonal authority within the prison. It can be argued that this is a consequence of insufficient supervision from a higher official Superintendent Zimbardo or Warden Jaffe that led to abuse. However Weber’s theory on legal authority and administrative rationality dictates that depersonalization should not have occurred as the rational rules of the organization should have been followed. A rational bureaucratic system informs people of the rules and guidelines that will govern their behaviour (Morrison, 2006). In Stanford Prison the prisoners were informed of the rules by the Warden at admission. However within this ‘rational system’ Guard Landry adds his personal element (Zimbardo, 2009), therefore internalising rules and depersonalizes his role as guard, thus Weber’s theory on impersonal authority has diminished on the first day. The admission process into an institution is routinely followed by guidelines and procedures (Morrison, 2006) the guards give orders and the prisoners follow them, however the guards mocked the prisoners through this process thus, removes impersonal authority. Clearly Weber’s theory of a rational system incorporating impersonal authority is not sufficient to explain the events of Stanford Prison. Goffman, Power and Authority A correlation can be made between Goffman’s theory on ‘mortification of the self’ when entering some institutions, and the prisoners entering Stanford Prison. Goffman identifies; names and titles are lost, institutional uniforms replace personal clothing, personal space is lost or disregarded, personal information discussed inappropriately and constant humiliation (1959 in Smith). The men entering Stanford Prison were fingerprinted, photographed, assigned a number, stripped naked and de-loused, personal items removed and issued with prison clothing, while the men’s’ head were not shaved they had to wear a socking to illustrate shaved head (Zimbardo, 2009). This was the result of a deliberate policy from the Superintendent to remove any trace of individual identity (Zimbardo, 2009). Thus the power of the organization to remove the prisoner’s sense of self, when he identifies himself by number and not name. Rules were followed by the guards in the admission process as directed by the Superintendent, this correlates with Weber’s theory with senior officials giving orders and direction to lower ranking officials and the rules being followed by the governed (Morrison, 2006). The degrading and humiliating process the prisoners endured can be identified in Goffman’s theory. As a result prisoners are now falling into their roles as they were compliant in the process of admission. The prisoners accepted this behaviour as the norm as they did not question authority. Goffman further identifies that institutions have a methodical goal to transform the inmates they control (Smith, 1999). Transformation is achieved through officials wishing to attain order as appose to the ethos of the institution. Therefore the power of the organization over inmates on entering the institution is the first reduction of the self (Goffman, 1959). Persons’ in authority are represented in status by dress and manner. This demeanour is powerful as it demonstrates the authority or power of the person (Goffman 1959, in Branaman and Lemert). Goffman shows why his theory of ‘presentation of self in ever day life’ is relevant to the power of an organization (Goffman 1959, in Trevino). He describe his theory as a theatrical performance, we are all acting guided by settings, appearances and manners, furniture, decor and physical layout including props which guide a performance (Trevino, 2003). The prisoners found it difficult to remove themselves from their role as they were constantly on stage and always had reminders; uniforms, chain around their ankle, setting (cell) they were constantly reminded of their status this was the implication the authoritarians wanted to inflict on the prisoners. Zimbardo identified people are actors on stage but have to be aware of the situation, taking into account who are the cast, what are the costumes and external factors (2008, Zimabrdo). Due to no stage direction or in the case of Stanford Prison poor supervision from the ‘director’ that is Superintendent or the Warden, inaccuracies occurred in relation to abuse of power and authority over the prisoners. It can be identified the relevance of a link between Weber (1968) and Goffman (1959, in Branaman and Lemert) in relation to the recruitment of officials, both theorist give reason for officials to be recruited with a minimal qualification, training or skills. Without the minimum training officials may work outside an impersonal system, work without ethics or conscious thus abusing authority and exercising excessive power. In addition people with a minimum qualification may have a better insight into the needs of a person and work ethically and on an impersonal basis. Conclusion To conclude in a bureaucratic organization officials remove subjective personality and therefore become impersonal by working within rules and ethics. The guards started out with such definable goals and means however the guards internalised the rules by adding to their own role and therefore depersonalized the workplace. As a result this paper critiques Weber’s theory in that it can be argued that a hierarchal bureaucracy is helpful in explaining one goal of the prison, the subjugation and pacification of the prisoners. However Weber’s theory does not account for the manner in which the guards abandoned the very rules they were meant to uphold in achieving the aims of the organization, they allowed their own personalised subjective roles to play a part and act against the organization. The guards ruled in a depersonalized manner, furthermore no intervention when their authority was inhumane and degrading. Goffman’s (1959) theory in regards to total institutions identifies removing a sense of self resulting in institutions gaining control over a person. Goffman (1959) identifies why control and loss of autonomy are incorporated into institutional life, it allows for little flexibility for activities, any activities are imposed by officials with depersonalized rules. These activities are designed to suit the rational plan of the official and not the person, thus an oppressive organization. Parallels can be drawn between Stanford Prison Experiment and Abu Ghraib in 2004. In Abu Ghraib the prisoners were subjected to inhumane, degrading and physical abuse at the hands of the officials. The character we perform and our innate self are described as equate, and can be seen as something housed within (Goffman 1959, in Branaman and Lemert). This implies we are all capable of hurting others, or can we act in opposites and fall into a heroic role.